Navigating uncertainty: the impact of Trump's proposed tariffs on global supply chains
As companies reevaluate their supply chains to accommodate Trump’s promise to impose tariffs immediately upon taking office, they should keep in mind five potential repercussions.
Bindiya Vakil is the chief executive officer of supply chain risk management company Resilinc. She is also a founding member of the Global Supply Chain Resiliency Council and a member of the Advisory Board of MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics. Vakil holds a master’s degree in supply chain management from MIT and an MBA in Finance.
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House, his promises of sweeping tariffs—including an additional 10% tariff on imports from China, a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and a 10% to 20% universal tariff on all other imports—have businesses rethinking their supply chains. The potential impact of these tariffs is expected to be substantial and wide-ranging, affecting numerous industries like automotive, manufacturing, industrial, defense, pharmaceuticals, and high-tech electronics. The impact will be particularly acute for consumer goods.
Many companies are already taking proactive measures to mitigate risks and prepare for various scenarios. Some are accelerating efforts to diversify their production away from China, while others are stockpiling inventory in the U.S. before the new administration takes office. No matter what tactic they are taking, one effect is certain: Companies need to reevaluate their supply chain strategies.
My company Resilinc has identified five key ways that Trump’s proposed tariffs will affect supply chains. Companies should carefully consider how each of these consequences will impact their supply chains and what responses they should take to mitigate the changes.
#1 Increase in prices
Tariffs could have far-reaching effects on consumer goods, including those produced domestically. Many products that Americans use daily rely on imported components. A substantial portion of items manufactured in the U.S.—from appliances and industrial goods to pharmaceuticals, cars, and electronics—include imported parts. For instance, key smartphone components such as processors, displays, and batteries are often sourced from countries like China, South Korea, and Taiwan. Tariffs will make the cost to produce and sell all of these goods significantly higher. If these cost increases are passed on to consumers, tariffs could ultimately influence consumer purchasing behavior. This might include reduced demand or shifts in preferences toward products not subject to tariffs.
#2 Change in freight flows and rates
The potential impact extends beyond just the cost of goods. The shipping industry is likely to see significant changes as well. In the short term, freight rates could spike as retailers rush to buy safety stock ahead of potential tariff implementations. However, in the longer term, broad tariffs could discourage imports, potentially slowing freight volumes at ports and driving down rates. This could have a ripple effect throughout the entire supply chain ecosystem.
#3 Retaliatory tariffs from other countries
When Trump was previously in office, the administration applied tariffs on steel, aluminum Chinese imports, and automotive imports. Within a year, other countries enacted numerous retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports in response. Some of the key products targeted included U.S. soybeans, pork, whiskey, and automobiles. Exports to China, the largest buyer of U.S. soybeans, dropped by nearly 75% in 2018 due to retaliatory tariffs and export volumes of some machinery products and vehicles dropped by 10%–20%. China placed tariffs on tens of billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. exports, and The European Union and Canada responded to steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing tariffs of their own. While it will be hard to predict how different countries will react this time, similar reactions are likely.
#4 Increased interest in nearshoring/reshoring
The proposed tariffs are likely to accelerate the trend of nearshoring and reshoring, with countries like Mexico potentially benefiting. Mexico is becoming more attractive due to its low labor costs, proximity, and potentially lower tariffs compared to China. In fact, Mexico was the United States’ top trading partner in 2024, surpassing China for the first time in over 20 years. In recent years, as companies have started increasing nearshoring initiatives, Mexico has become a critical part of these strategies. With costs potentially rising for Chinese goods, Central America could benefit as a nearshore option—even with a 10% tariff. Other countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and India are also emerging as alternatives to China.
However, both nearshoring and reshoring come with their own challenges. Setting up a new factory can be extremely costly and time intensive. Plus, labor in the U.S. is expensive. The average manufacturing wage as of January 2022 in the U.S. was $24.55 per hour, compared to an average of $2.80 per hour in Mexico.
Next, China has dominated as the “world’s factory” for a long time; its ecosystem of easy-to-find vendors for components of manufactured products will be hard to replicate. Scaling suppliers and finding availability of certain products and parts could prove difficult in the U.S., at least for the next few years. If a company reshores product assembly to the U.S., for example, but is still reliant on nuts and bolts from Chinese or Taiwanese suppliers, it has not solved its supply chain problem. Establishing new supplier networks can be time-intensive and costly.
While reshoring may help companies avoid tariffs, it introduces new challenges. For instance, Intel’s effort to establish a semiconductor plant in Arizona faces the hurdle of water scarcity, a critical issue for facilities that require an uninterrupted water supply. Meanwhile, Intel’s planned site in Ohio avoids this issue but faces a shortage of workers.
To be clear, the U.S. is not a risk-free region. Nowhere is risk-free. By reshoring or nearshoring, companies may mitigate certain risks but encounter a new set of uncertainties, potentially impacting supply chain stability.
#5 Tariffs may be applied unevenly
Companies are not just passively waiting for these changes to occur. Following the tariffs previously enacted under the Trump Administration, many U.S. companies responded by lobbying for product exemptions to safeguard their finances and operations. Apple, for instance, received 10 out of 15 requested exemptions for items like computer chargers and mice that were solely available from China. This time, certain products may face even greater tariff impacts. Automotive parts, which frequently across the Mexico-U.S. border, could incur rising costs with each crossing, prompting automakers to lobby for exemptions.
On the opposite side of the equation, the Trump administration may consider imposing tariffs on specific companies instead of country-specific tariffs. For instance, Chinese companies have increasingly shifted production to countries like Vietnam, making China Vietnam's largest trading partner in 2023, with trade totaling $172 billion. To prevent Chinese products from being rerouted through other countries to reach the U.S., the administration may impose targeted measures aimed at companies. In recent years, for instance, the U.S. has imposed significant sanctions on Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei and ZTE, citing national security concerns.
How companies can prepare
To prepare for these potential changes, companies are advised to take several key steps. The most critical (and foundational) step companies can take is to map their entire subtier supplier network—identifying where their products and components originate and which could be affected.
Additional key steps for readiness include:
1. Modeling “what-if” scenarios to quantify potential business impacts.
2. Preparing detailed data for exclusion requests and to support rapid adjustments.
3. Evaluating supply chain diversification options, balancing risks and benefits by region.
4. Anticipating potential shifts in consumer behavior and financial impacts.
5. Closely monitoring announcements on tariffs and exemption procedures.
The next year is expected to be a dynamic one for global supply chains. Trump's proposed tariffs are already having a significant impact, even before any official policies have been implemented. To prepare, companies must expect uncertainty and create an action plan now—not later. Companies that have already mapped their supply chains and collected comprehensive data will be better positioned to respond quickly and effectively as tariffs are rolled out.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.