Supply Chain Xchange's 2024 Outstanding Women in Supply Chain Award winners
Photos courtesy of award winners
The four winners of the 2024 “Outstanding Women in Supply Chain Award” reflect on their career paths, leadership styles, and what the industry as a whole can do to inspire more people to enter the supply chain profession.
It’s an unfortunate truth: In spite of significant gains, women only represent 40% of the total supply chain workforce and only 35% of managers. These sobering figures come from the “2024 Women in Supply Chain Survey” authored by the analyst group Gartner and AWESOME, a nonprofit focused on advancing women’s supply chain leadership.
But by dwelling on the negative aspects of this truth, we run the risk of overlooking the significant impact that many women leaders are having on the supply chain field today.
Supply Chain Xchange’sOutstanding Women in Supply Chain Award seeks to shine a spotlight on women who are helping to reimagine and direct the future of supply chain management—not just for their own companies but for the profession as a whole.
The 2024 recipients are:
Annette Danek-Akey, chief supply chain officer (CSCO) at Barnes & Noble; Sherry Harriman, former senior vice president of logistics and supply chain for Academy Sports + Outdoors; Leslie O'Regan-Yount, director of product management for distribution center systems and third-party logistics at American Eagle Outfitters Inc.; and Ammie McAsey, senior vice president of customer distribution experience for McKesson's U.S. pharmaceutical distribution division.
Danek-Akey joined Barnes & Noble as CSCO in September of 2024 after a long career at book publisher Penguin Random House, where she had also risen to the role of CSCO. Recently retired, Harriman guided Academy Sports + Outdoors’ logistics and supply chain operations after working for nearly 30 years at Walmart in distribution. With 20 years of experience in the supply chain and technology space, O'Regan-Yount is currently playing an integral role in the implementation of innovative technology for American Eagle’s distribution operations. McAsey is currently responsible for leading the distribution strategy across the U.S. for brand, generic, and specialty pharmaceuticals at health care distributor McKesson. In addition, she supports McKesson’s initiatives to provide COVID-19 vaccines and ancillary supply kits on behalf of the U.S. government.
The award winners were recognized at the CSCMP EDGE Conference in the Fall of 2024. The following is an excerpt from the subsequent panel discussion moderated by
Supply Chain Xchange Executive Editor Susan Lacefield. (The full panel discussion can be view on our website under the video section.)
Can you talk a little bit about your career path, and how you got into the position where you are today?
Annette Danek-Akey: I have an interesting career path because I was for the last 28 and a half years on the publishing side at Penguin Random House, where I was the chief supply chain officer. So I'm looking forward to being on the other side of the supply chain [at retailer Barnes and Noble].
How did I get to where I am? My background is in industrial engineering. When you're an industrial engineer, you have to convince someone else to do a project. So at some point, I realized the best place to be was probably to be in charge, because then I could implement my own ideas. But what I didn't realize is that you still have to convince people and you have to do it in a collaborative fashion.
I started my career in retail at Sears in logistics, and at some point, I got a call from a recruiter. There was an opportunity to go to this very small book publisher distribution facility. If you're at a big company, sometimes you get pigeonholed into one job, and I wanted to do it all. That's just my personality type. So, I said, “I'm going to take the step.” I went to that smaller company, and I got to learn it all. And then we just happened to grow into the world's largest trade publisher.
Sherry Harriman: Before I retired, I had the opportunity to lead Academy Sports + Outdoor’s supply chain and logistics for six years. But before that, I worked 29 years at Walmart. I started out just needing a job, working my way through college. And so, I say, supply chain found me. I started out as a break-pack order filler, and when I left Walmart, I had responsibility for six distribution centers in the state of Florida and one in Puerto Rico.
When I look back on my career, what worked well for me was always accepting new roles and responsibilities and appreciating that maybe someone had more faith in me or more vision for me than I had.
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: So my career path was a little different. I am very much a go-getter. I'm going to go out and grab an opportunity. I'm not going wait for somebody to give it to me. I have never been promoted in my entire career. When I got promoted, it was because I took a different job with a different company. Essentially, I've talked my way into every career move I've ever made.
That has led me to here, where I am the person responsible for all the software and hardware technologies inside American Eagle to get all our products out to our customers or out to our stores.
Ammie McAsey: My career actually started during a college job at DSC Logistics. I worked second shift in the shipping and receiving window, and I just kind of fell in love with it. I was a marketing major. I wanted to move to North Carolina. I wanted to work on race car teams and work for one of those big Roger Penske teams out in North Carolina. Instead, I took my first job in North Carolina to get my foot in the door. And I never left logistics. So whether it's beverages, building supplies, apparel, or now pharmaceuticals, I've just stayed in love with the industry, and it's gotten me where I am today.
How would describe your leadership style and the skills and experiences that helped shape that style?
Ammie McAsey: It's about caring about people, bringing people together, solving problems, and having fun. If you cannot have fun at work, you're missing out. We start all of our team meetings five minutes late. A lot of people say they're going to end five minutes early. Never happens. But if you start five minutes late, those five minutes allow for everyone to just show up, and that's kind of our social, fun time. There's always a good story. So really, it's about understanding your team, caring about them, working together, and just inspiring the best in everyone.
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: I like to be empowering to the people underneath me. I'm not a micromanager. I don't want to know how you're going to get from point A to point B. I'm going to tell you where point B needs to be, and I'm going to empower you to make the decisions necessary to get there. If you fall along the way, that's fine. I'll pick you up. I'm here to guide you, to help you, to throw ideas off. But I don't want to be that micromanaging boss. I want you to make a decision, and I'm going to back your play, right or wrong.
Also [my leadership style involves] understanding what associates want to get out of their career and trying to help them get to those positions, get to those assignments. That’s what makes people want to come back and work for you.
Sherry Harriman: One of the things that I've learned over my career is, it's a circle: lead with support and follow up for accountability. I've been put in positions in my career where I wasn't the expert, and that [philosophy] just became even more valuable. If you've transitioned into a new department or into a new company, focus on finding out what the teams need to be successful at their job and how do we achieve goals together. Then you follow up to make sure that they did what they said they were going to do. I think that's the best leadership model that you can have.
For talent development, it's caring about people, not just what they do, but who they are, and valuing the diversity of thought. Diverse teams sometimes can have the most controversy, because not everyone thinks alike. But if you can learn to absorb and welcome that feedback—whether it's good feedback or challenging feedback—then you will come up with the best solution.
Annette Danek-Akey: If you ever want to learn about your leadership style, work at a company for 28 years and then leave, because that's when people tell you what they're going to miss about you. So as I left [Penguin Random House], I took it as an opportunity to say, “Well, what was it about me?” I really asked for that direct feedback.
What I found is that there's three things. The first thing for me is that people say I'm visionary. And I was trying to think, “Well, why am I visionary?” And I think it’s because I am an avid reader. I read about a book a week, and I read a lot of fiction. If you read fiction books, you have to have an imagination.
The second is that I'm very collaborative, and that’s because you can't get that vision done on your own. You need other people to bring that vision to life.
The third thing is people would say I’m very scientific with a methodology to get things done. I think that's true, because the way that you put that vision or supply chain model out there is to say, “Here's our steps.” I personally like having a process to do something, because then people know what to expect.
How do you help mentor people into leaders who maybe don't have what are seen as traditional leadership characteristics?
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: You're going to find that this new generation coming in, Gen Z and Gen Alpha, have a very different take on social skills. A lot more of them are much more introverted than you would want them to be. So to coach them into a leadership role, you have to look for the strength that they have and then figure out ways to allow them to practice to be confident in a safe space (I know that's a terrible way to put it).
For example, I’ve had a lot of folks who were very nervous about getting up in front of people and presenting. Then you need to practice until you're not, whether it’s practicing presenting to yourself, or to the dog, or to another leader who you're comfortable with. It's a different kind of coaching.
The other technique I always teach them is, you better fake it until you make it. So if you're nervous and uncomfortable, that's okay. Pretend that you're not, and one day you won't be. It worked for me for in consulting for many years.
Sherry Harriman: Something that I found successful is, if you know who's going to be in the meeting, then getting them exposure to those individuals previous to the meeting. So that you're not the only sponsor in that meeting. That’s part of building that confidence quietly through one-on-one conversations with some of the key influencers in the meeting. I’ve found that to be very successful as well.
Annette Danek-Akey: One of the things that I encourage people to do if they're trying to practice leadership skills and especially influencing is to go be on a board at a nonprofit organization or help at CSCMP. Because you have to lead through influence, and no one really knows you. It's not the job; so go practice. I try to convince people to do that when they have the time. You have to have the time to do that, but if you do, you'll get so much out of it.
What can we do as an industry to develop and inspire more women to take leadership positions in the supply chain?
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: My vote is always to start younger. To be fair, if you tell a bunch of fifth graders that there's a career in distribution, they're going go, “What's that?” So, I think in this age of robotics, let’s bring all of this cool technology to the younger generation so they get excited about the shiny toy. And then as they get older introduce them to the rest of the topics.
Sherry Harriman: To tag on to that it's not just moving boxes and driving trucks. Logistics and supply chain is so much more than that. You can have any career that you want to have in supply chain. It's analytical. There's a financial piece, there's a marketing piece. You can find your way in it. We need to get the message out that if you want a career that you can have multiple opportunities, there's no better field than supply chain. You can move from one area to the other and grow your career effectively by doing that.
How do we then help them get up to those higher leadership roles? What sort of programs work, and what doesn't work?
Ammie McAsey: It's finding that diverse talent—women, men, it doesn’t matter. Find good talent and bring them along. Bring them through the door that they don't even know exists. They may not have the subject matter expertise, but bring them along. I love all of the employee resource groups that we do, but sometimes leadership is one person at a time, and then multiply that effect. That person that you pulled through, have that person pull somebody else through. It really becomes the multiplier effect that then starts to create this energy.
Sherry Harriman: One of the things I would add is whatever the diversity, you can never look at yourself as a victim. You've already lost the battle if you're thinking from a victim mentality. Victims oftentimes behave defensively, and you have to take your career offensively to make sure that you make it your own.
And then, it can't be men against women. It has to be men with women and women with men. We have often complementary skill sets, and the only way that we can improve the industry is to have it be all of us working together. It can't be women trying to create our own path of success. It has to be bringing others up, bringing others along, all of us together.
Annette Danek-Akey: I always go really pragmatic on this. I think vacation time and paid time off is just key for everyone. The last two years I've worked in England, and so I now see the difference for real. I've been in your shoes, listening to people saying, “we need more vacation” and thinking well it's different [here]. Yeah, it's different, and two weeks just doesn't cut it. So if you want to have a more diverse workforce, add more vacation time, and I know that's easier said than done.
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House, his promises of sweeping tariffs—including an additional 10% tariff on imports from China, a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and a 10% to 20% universal tariff on all other imports—have businesses rethinking their supply chains. The potential impact of these tariffs is expected to be substantial and wide-ranging, affecting numerous industries like automotive, manufacturing, industrial, defense, pharmaceuticals, and high-tech electronics. The impact will be particularly acute for consumer goods.
Many companies are already taking proactive measures to mitigate risks and prepare for various scenarios. Some are accelerating efforts to diversify their production away from China, while others are stockpiling inventory in the U.S. before the new administration takes office. No matter what tactic they are taking, one effect is certain: Companies need to reevaluate their supply chain strategies.
My company Resilinc has identified five key ways that Trump’s proposed tariffs will affect supply chains. Companies should carefully consider how each of these consequences will impact their supply chains and what responses they should take to mitigate the changes.
#1 Increase in prices
Tariffs could have far-reaching effects on consumer goods, including those produced domestically. Many products that Americans use daily rely on imported components. A substantial portion of items manufactured in the U.S.—from appliances and industrial goods to pharmaceuticals, cars, and electronics—include imported parts. For instance, key smartphone components such as processors, displays, and batteries are often sourced from countries like China, South Korea, and Taiwan. Tariffs will make the cost to produce and sell all of these goods significantly higher. If these cost increases are passed on to consumers, tariffs could ultimately influence consumer purchasing behavior. This might include reduced demand or shifts in preferences toward products not subject to tariffs.
#2 Change in freight flows and rates
The potential impact extends beyond just the cost of goods. The shipping industry is likely to see significant changes as well. In the short term, freight rates could spike as retailers rush to buy safety stock ahead of potential tariff implementations. However, in the longer term, broad tariffs could discourage imports, potentially slowing freight volumes at ports and driving down rates. This could have a ripple effect throughout the entire supply chain ecosystem.
#3 Retaliatory tariffs from other countries
When Trump was previously in office, the administration applied tariffs on steel, aluminum Chinese imports, and automotive imports. Within a year, other countries enacted numerous retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports in response. Some of the key products targeted included U.S. soybeans, pork, whiskey, and automobiles. Exports to China, the largest buyer of U.S. soybeans, dropped by nearly 75% in 2018 due to retaliatory tariffs and export volumes of some machinery products and vehicles dropped by 10%–20%. China placed tariffs on tens of billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. exports, and The European Union and Canada responded to steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing tariffs of their own. While it will be hard to predict how different countries will react this time, similar reactions are likely.
#4 Increased interest in nearshoring/reshoring
The proposed tariffs are likely to accelerate the trend of nearshoring and reshoring, with countries like Mexico potentially benefiting. Mexico is becoming more attractive due to its low labor costs, proximity, and potentially lower tariffs compared to China. In fact, Mexico was the United States’ top trading partner in 2024, surpassing China for the first time in over 20 years. In recent years, as companies have started increasing nearshoring initiatives, Mexico has become a critical part of these strategies. With costs potentially rising for Chinese goods, Central America could benefit as a nearshore option—even with a 10% tariff. Other countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and India are also emerging as alternatives to China.
However, both nearshoring and reshoring come with their own challenges. Setting up a new factory can be extremely costly and time intensive. Plus, labor in the U.S. is expensive. The average manufacturing wage as of January 2022 in the U.S. was $24.55 per hour, compared to an average of $2.80 per hour in Mexico.
Next, China has dominated as the “world’s factory” for a long time; its ecosystem of easy-to-find vendors for components of manufactured products will be hard to replicate. Scaling suppliers and finding availability of certain products and parts could prove difficult in the U.S., at least for the next few years. If a company reshores product assembly to the U.S., for example, but is still reliant on nuts and bolts from Chinese or Taiwanese suppliers, it has not solved its supply chain problem. Establishing new supplier networks can be time-intensive and costly.
While reshoring may help companies avoid tariffs, it introduces new challenges. For instance, Intel’s effort to establish a semiconductor plant in Arizona faces the hurdle of water scarcity, a critical issue for facilities that require an uninterrupted water supply. Meanwhile, Intel’s planned site in Ohio avoids this issue but faces a shortage of workers.
To be clear, the U.S. is not a risk-free region. Nowhere is risk-free. By reshoring or nearshoring, companies may mitigate certain risks but encounter a new set of uncertainties, potentially impacting supply chain stability.
#5 Tariffs may be applied unevenly
Companies are not just passively waiting for these changes to occur. Following the tariffs previously enacted under the Trump Administration, many U.S. companies responded by lobbying for product exemptions to safeguard their finances and operations. Apple, for instance, received 10 out of 15 requested exemptions for items like computer chargers and mice that were solely available from China. This time, certain products may face even greater tariff impacts. Automotive parts, which frequently across the Mexico-U.S. border, could incur rising costs with each crossing, prompting automakers to lobby for exemptions.
On the opposite side of the equation, the Trump administration may consider imposing tariffs on specific companies instead of country-specific tariffs. For instance, Chinese companies have increasingly shifted production to countries like Vietnam, making China Vietnam's largest trading partner in 2023, with trade totaling $172 billion. To prevent Chinese products from being rerouted through other countries to reach the U.S., the administration may impose targeted measures aimed at companies. In recent years, for instance, the U.S. has imposed significant sanctions on Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei and ZTE, citing national security concerns.
How companies can prepare
To prepare for these potential changes, companies are advised to take several key steps. The most critical (and foundational) step companies can take is to map their entire subtier supplier network—identifying where their products and components originate and which could be affected.
Additional key steps for readiness include:
1. Modeling “what-if” scenarios to quantify potential business impacts.
2. Preparing detailed data for exclusion requests and to support rapid adjustments.
3. Evaluating supply chain diversification options, balancing risks and benefits by region.
4. Anticipating potential shifts in consumer behavior and financial impacts.
5. Closely monitoring announcements on tariffs and exemption procedures.
The next year is expected to be a dynamic one for global supply chains. Trump's proposed tariffs are already having a significant impact, even before any official policies have been implemented. To prepare, companies must expect uncertainty and create an action plan now—not later. Companies that have already mapped their supply chains and collected comprehensive data will be better positioned to respond quickly and effectively as tariffs are rolled out.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Each of those points could have a stark impact on business operations, the firm said. First, supply chain restrictions will continue to drive up costs, following examples like European tariffs on Chinese autos and the U.S. plan to prevent Chinese software and hardware from entering cars in America.
Second, reputational risk will peak due to increased corporate transparency and due diligence laws, such as Germany’s Supply Chain Due Diligence Act that addresses hotpoint issues like modern slavery, forced labor, human trafficking, and environmental damage. In an age when polarized public opinion is combined with ever-present social media, doing business with a supplier whom a lot of your customers view negatively will be hard to navigate.
And third, advances in data, technology, and supplier risk assessments will enable executives to measure the impact of disruptions more effectively. Those calculations can help organizations determine whether their risk mitigation strategies represent value for money when compared to the potential revenues losses in the event of a supply chain disruption.
“Looking past the holidays, retailers will need to prepare for the typical challenges posed by seasonal slowdown in consumer demand. This year, however, there will be much less of a lull, as U.S. companies are accelerating some purchases that could potentially be impacted by a new wave of tariffs on U.S. imports,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management Solutions at Moody’s, said in a release. “Tariffs, sanctions and other supply chain restrictions will likely be top of the 2025 agenda for procurement executives.”
Measured over the entire year of 2024, retailers estimate that 16.9% of their annual sales will be returned. But that total figure includes a spike of returns during the holidays; a separate NRF study found that for the 2024 winter holidays, retailers expect their return rate to be 17% higher, on average, than their annual return rate.
Despite the cost of handling that massive reverse logistics task, retailers grin and bear it because product returns are so tightly integrated with brand loyalty, offering companies an additional touchpoint to provide a positive interaction with their customers, NRF Vice President of Industry and Consumer Insights Katherine Cullen said in a release. According to NRF’s research, 76% of consumers consider free returns a key factor in deciding where to shop, and 67% say a negative return experience would discourage them from shopping with a retailer again. And 84% of consumers report being more likely to shop with a retailer that offers no box/no label returns and immediate refunds.
So in response to consumer demand, retailers continue to enhance the return experience for customers. More than two-thirds of retailers surveyed (68%) say they are prioritizing upgrading their returns capabilities within the next six months. In addition, improving the returns experience and reducing the return rate are viewed as two of the most important elements for businesses in achieving their 2025 goals.
However, retailers also must balance meeting consumer demand for seamless returns against rising costs. Fraudulent and abusive returns practices create both logistical and financial challenges for retailers. A majority (93%) of retailers said retail fraud and other exploitive behavior is a significant issue for their business. In terms of abuse, bracketing – purchasing multiple items with the intent to return some – has seen growth among younger consumers, with 51% of Gen Z consumers indicating they engage in this practice.
“Return policies are no longer just a post-purchase consideration – they’re shaping how younger generations shop from the start,” David Sobie, co-founder and CEO of Happy Returns, said in a release. “With behaviors like bracketing and rising return rates putting strain on traditional systems, retailers need to rethink reverse logistics. Solutions like no box/no label returns with item verification enable immediate refunds, meeting customer expectations for convenience while increasing accuracy, reducing fraud and helping to protect profitability in a competitive market.”
The research came from two complementary surveys conducted this fall, allowing NRF and Happy Returns to compare perspectives from both sides. They included one that gathered responses from 2,007 consumers who had returned at least one online purchase within the past year, and another from 249 e-commerce and finance professionals from large U.S. retailers.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).