Supply Chain Xchange's 2024 Outstanding Women in Supply Chain Award winners
Photos courtesy of award winners
The four winners of the 2024 “Outstanding Women in Supply Chain Award” reflect on their career paths, leadership styles, and what the industry as a whole can do to inspire more people to enter the supply chain profession.
It’s an unfortunate truth: In spite of significant gains, women only represent 40% of the total supply chain workforce and only 35% of managers. These sobering figures come from the “2024 Women in Supply Chain Survey” authored by the analyst group Gartner and AWESOME, a nonprofit focused on advancing women’s supply chain leadership.
But by dwelling on the negative aspects of this truth, we run the risk of overlooking the significant impact that many women leaders are having on the supply chain field today.
Supply Chain Xchange’sOutstanding Women in Supply Chain Award seeks to shine a spotlight on women who are helping to reimagine and direct the future of supply chain management—not just for their own companies but for the profession as a whole.
The 2024 recipients are:
Annette Danek-Akey, chief supply chain officer (CSCO) at Barnes & Noble; Sherry Harriman, former senior vice president of logistics and supply chain for Academy Sports + Outdoors; Leslie O'Regan-Yount, director of product management for distribution center systems and third-party logistics at American Eagle Outfitters Inc.; and Ammie McAsey, senior vice president of customer distribution experience for McKesson's U.S. pharmaceutical distribution division.
Danek-Akey joined Barnes & Noble as CSCO in September of 2024 after a long career at book publisher Penguin Random House, where she had also risen to the role of CSCO. Recently retired, Harriman guided Academy Sports + Outdoors’ logistics and supply chain operations after working for nearly 30 years at Walmart in distribution. With 20 years of experience in the supply chain and technology space, O'Regan-Yount is currently playing an integral role in the implementation of innovative technology for American Eagle’s distribution operations. McAsey is currently responsible for leading the distribution strategy across the U.S. for brand, generic, and specialty pharmaceuticals at health care distributor McKesson. In addition, she supports McKesson’s initiatives to provide COVID-19 vaccines and ancillary supply kits on behalf of the U.S. government.
The award winners were recognized at the CSCMP EDGE Conference in the Fall of 2024. The following is an excerpt from the subsequent panel discussion moderated by
Supply Chain Xchange Executive Editor Susan Lacefield. (The full panel discussion can be view on our website under the video section.)
Can you talk a little bit about your career path, and how you got into the position where you are today?
Annette Danek-Akey: I have an interesting career path because I was for the last 28 and a half years on the publishing side at Penguin Random House, where I was the chief supply chain officer. So I'm looking forward to being on the other side of the supply chain [at retailer Barnes and Noble].
How did I get to where I am? My background is in industrial engineering. When you're an industrial engineer, you have to convince someone else to do a project. So at some point, I realized the best place to be was probably to be in charge, because then I could implement my own ideas. But what I didn't realize is that you still have to convince people and you have to do it in a collaborative fashion.
I started my career in retail at Sears in logistics, and at some point, I got a call from a recruiter. There was an opportunity to go to this very small book publisher distribution facility. If you're at a big company, sometimes you get pigeonholed into one job, and I wanted to do it all. That's just my personality type. So, I said, “I'm going to take the step.” I went to that smaller company, and I got to learn it all. And then we just happened to grow into the world's largest trade publisher.
Sherry Harriman: Before I retired, I had the opportunity to lead Academy Sports + Outdoor’s supply chain and logistics for six years. But before that, I worked 29 years at Walmart. I started out just needing a job, working my way through college. And so, I say, supply chain found me. I started out as a break-pack order filler, and when I left Walmart, I had responsibility for six distribution centers in the state of Florida and one in Puerto Rico.
When I look back on my career, what worked well for me was always accepting new roles and responsibilities and appreciating that maybe someone had more faith in me or more vision for me than I had.
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: So my career path was a little different. I am very much a go-getter. I'm going to go out and grab an opportunity. I'm not going wait for somebody to give it to me. I have never been promoted in my entire career. When I got promoted, it was because I took a different job with a different company. Essentially, I've talked my way into every career move I've ever made.
That has led me to here, where I am the person responsible for all the software and hardware technologies inside American Eagle to get all our products out to our customers or out to our stores.
Ammie McAsey: My career actually started during a college job at DSC Logistics. I worked second shift in the shipping and receiving window, and I just kind of fell in love with it. I was a marketing major. I wanted to move to North Carolina. I wanted to work on race car teams and work for one of those big Roger Penske teams out in North Carolina. Instead, I took my first job in North Carolina to get my foot in the door. And I never left logistics. So whether it's beverages, building supplies, apparel, or now pharmaceuticals, I've just stayed in love with the industry, and it's gotten me where I am today.
How would describe your leadership style and the skills and experiences that helped shape that style?
Ammie McAsey: It's about caring about people, bringing people together, solving problems, and having fun. If you cannot have fun at work, you're missing out. We start all of our team meetings five minutes late. A lot of people say they're going to end five minutes early. Never happens. But if you start five minutes late, those five minutes allow for everyone to just show up, and that's kind of our social, fun time. There's always a good story. So really, it's about understanding your team, caring about them, working together, and just inspiring the best in everyone.
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: I like to be empowering to the people underneath me. I'm not a micromanager. I don't want to know how you're going to get from point A to point B. I'm going to tell you where point B needs to be, and I'm going to empower you to make the decisions necessary to get there. If you fall along the way, that's fine. I'll pick you up. I'm here to guide you, to help you, to throw ideas off. But I don't want to be that micromanaging boss. I want you to make a decision, and I'm going to back your play, right or wrong.
Also [my leadership style involves] understanding what associates want to get out of their career and trying to help them get to those positions, get to those assignments. That’s what makes people want to come back and work for you.
Sherry Harriman: One of the things that I've learned over my career is, it's a circle: lead with support and follow up for accountability. I've been put in positions in my career where I wasn't the expert, and that [philosophy] just became even more valuable. If you've transitioned into a new department or into a new company, focus on finding out what the teams need to be successful at their job and how do we achieve goals together. Then you follow up to make sure that they did what they said they were going to do. I think that's the best leadership model that you can have.
For talent development, it's caring about people, not just what they do, but who they are, and valuing the diversity of thought. Diverse teams sometimes can have the most controversy, because not everyone thinks alike. But if you can learn to absorb and welcome that feedback—whether it's good feedback or challenging feedback—then you will come up with the best solution.
Annette Danek-Akey: If you ever want to learn about your leadership style, work at a company for 28 years and then leave, because that's when people tell you what they're going to miss about you. So as I left [Penguin Random House], I took it as an opportunity to say, “Well, what was it about me?” I really asked for that direct feedback.
What I found is that there's three things. The first thing for me is that people say I'm visionary. And I was trying to think, “Well, why am I visionary?” And I think it’s because I am an avid reader. I read about a book a week, and I read a lot of fiction. If you read fiction books, you have to have an imagination.
The second is that I'm very collaborative, and that’s because you can't get that vision done on your own. You need other people to bring that vision to life.
The third thing is people would say I’m very scientific with a methodology to get things done. I think that's true, because the way that you put that vision or supply chain model out there is to say, “Here's our steps.” I personally like having a process to do something, because then people know what to expect.
How do you help mentor people into leaders who maybe don't have what are seen as traditional leadership characteristics?
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: You're going to find that this new generation coming in, Gen Z and Gen Alpha, have a very different take on social skills. A lot more of them are much more introverted than you would want them to be. So to coach them into a leadership role, you have to look for the strength that they have and then figure out ways to allow them to practice to be confident in a safe space (I know that's a terrible way to put it).
For example, I’ve had a lot of folks who were very nervous about getting up in front of people and presenting. Then you need to practice until you're not, whether it’s practicing presenting to yourself, or to the dog, or to another leader who you're comfortable with. It's a different kind of coaching.
The other technique I always teach them is, you better fake it until you make it. So if you're nervous and uncomfortable, that's okay. Pretend that you're not, and one day you won't be. It worked for me for in consulting for many years.
Sherry Harriman: Something that I found successful is, if you know who's going to be in the meeting, then getting them exposure to those individuals previous to the meeting. So that you're not the only sponsor in that meeting. That’s part of building that confidence quietly through one-on-one conversations with some of the key influencers in the meeting. I’ve found that to be very successful as well.
Annette Danek-Akey: One of the things that I encourage people to do if they're trying to practice leadership skills and especially influencing is to go be on a board at a nonprofit organization or help at CSCMP. Because you have to lead through influence, and no one really knows you. It's not the job; so go practice. I try to convince people to do that when they have the time. You have to have the time to do that, but if you do, you'll get so much out of it.
What can we do as an industry to develop and inspire more women to take leadership positions in the supply chain?
Leslie O'Regan-Yount: My vote is always to start younger. To be fair, if you tell a bunch of fifth graders that there's a career in distribution, they're going go, “What's that?” So, I think in this age of robotics, let’s bring all of this cool technology to the younger generation so they get excited about the shiny toy. And then as they get older introduce them to the rest of the topics.
Sherry Harriman: To tag on to that it's not just moving boxes and driving trucks. Logistics and supply chain is so much more than that. You can have any career that you want to have in supply chain. It's analytical. There's a financial piece, there's a marketing piece. You can find your way in it. We need to get the message out that if you want a career that you can have multiple opportunities, there's no better field than supply chain. You can move from one area to the other and grow your career effectively by doing that.
How do we then help them get up to those higher leadership roles? What sort of programs work, and what doesn't work?
Ammie McAsey: It's finding that diverse talent—women, men, it doesn’t matter. Find good talent and bring them along. Bring them through the door that they don't even know exists. They may not have the subject matter expertise, but bring them along. I love all of the employee resource groups that we do, but sometimes leadership is one person at a time, and then multiply that effect. That person that you pulled through, have that person pull somebody else through. It really becomes the multiplier effect that then starts to create this energy.
Sherry Harriman: One of the things I would add is whatever the diversity, you can never look at yourself as a victim. You've already lost the battle if you're thinking from a victim mentality. Victims oftentimes behave defensively, and you have to take your career offensively to make sure that you make it your own.
And then, it can't be men against women. It has to be men with women and women with men. We have often complementary skill sets, and the only way that we can improve the industry is to have it be all of us working together. It can't be women trying to create our own path of success. It has to be bringing others up, bringing others along, all of us together.
Annette Danek-Akey: I always go really pragmatic on this. I think vacation time and paid time off is just key for everyone. The last two years I've worked in England, and so I now see the difference for real. I've been in your shoes, listening to people saying, “we need more vacation” and thinking well it's different [here]. Yeah, it's different, and two weeks just doesn't cut it. So if you want to have a more diverse workforce, add more vacation time, and I know that's easier said than done.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
Shippers are actively preparing for changes in tariffs and trade policy through steps like analyzing their existing customs data, identifying alternative suppliers, and re-evaluating their cross-border strategies, according to research from logistics provider C.H. Robinson.
They are acting now because survey results show that shippers say the top risk to their supply chains in 2025 is changes in tariffs and trade policy. And nearly 50% say the uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy is already a pain point for them today, the Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company said.
In a move to answer those concerns, C.H. Robinson says it has been working with its clients by running risk scenarios, building and implementing contingency plans, engineering and executing tariff solutions, and increasing supply chain diversification and agility.
“Having visibility into your full supply chain is no longer a nice-to-have. In 2025, visibility is a competitive differentiator and shippers without the technology and expertise to support real-time data and insights, contingency planning, and quick action will face increased supply chain risks,” Jordan Kass, President of C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions, said in a release.
The company’s survey showed that shippers say the top five ways they are planning for those risks: identifying where they can switch sourcing to save money, analyzing customs data, evaluating cross-border strategies, running risk scenarios, and lowering their dependence on Chinese imports.
President of C.H. Robinson Global Forwarding, Mike Short, said: “In today’s uncertain shipping environment, shippers are looking for ways to reduce their susceptibility to events that impact logistics but are out of their control. By diversifying their supply chains, getting access to the latest information and having a global supply chain partner able to flex with their needs at a moment’s notice, shippers can gain something they don’t always have when disruptions and policy changes occur - options.”
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in January, growing at its fastest clip in nearly two years, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The LMI jumped nearly five points from December to a reading of 62, reflecting continued steady growth in the U.S. economy along with faster-than-expected inventory growth across the sector as retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers attempted to manage the uncertainty of tariffs and a changing regulatory environment. The January reading represented the fastest rate of expansion since June 2022, the LMI researchers said.
An LMI reading above 50 indicates growth across warehousing and transportation markets, and a reading below 50 indicates contraction. The LMI has remained in the mid- to high 50s range for most of the past year, indicating moderate, consistent growth in logistics markets.
Inventory levels rose 8.5 points from December, driven by downstream retailers stocking up ahead of the Trump administration’s potential tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China. Those increases led to higher costs throughout the industry: inventory costs, warehousing prices, and transportation prices all expanded to readings above 70, indicating strong growth. This occurred alongside slowing growth in warehousing and transportation capacity, suggesting that prices are up due to demand rather than other factors, such as inflation, according to the LMI researchers.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).