Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

COMMENTARY

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

By balancing global sourcing and local availability of critical supplies, procurement teams can better navigate disruptions, improve supply chain resilience, and mitigate risks.

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.


After steering through the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, procurement continues to face new disruptions driven by geopolitics. For example, many procurement teams are continuing to deal with issues related to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war that began in early 2022. More recently, the Israel-Palestine conflict and disruptions in the Red Sea and Suez Canal have forced global freight providers to reroute shipping containers around Africa, which has intensified costs and increased lead times.

The ever-expanding volatilities of global supply have caused many companies to revisit their procurement strategies and put more focus into multisourcing, nearshoring, and regionalizing their supply chains to improve resilience against such disruptions. In a recent Gartner survey, 63% of respondents said they were investing in multisourcing to “achieve greater resilience and/or agility.” Similarly, according to McKinsey’s “2023 Supply Chain Pulse Survey,” “almost two-thirds (64%) of respondents say that they are currently regionalizing their supply chains, up from 44% last year [in 2022].”

Multisourcing is a great strategy for responding to risks and threats by having alternative sources of supply or backup supply. Essentially, it is about diluting the risk over multiple suppliers. Sourcing diversification across distinct geographies and/or nearshoring can also mitigate the risk from sudden changes in import tariffs due to trade wars.

While this trend is pointed at enhancing the resilience of global trade in the face of disruptions, it is a colossal undertaking for procurement teams to reorganize complex global supply chains. Procurement now needs cope with new challenges, such as finding and qualifying new providers, cutting supply lead times, and reducing logistics complexities.

Most groups of companies or large multinational organizations which operate several establishments adopt some compromise between purchasing globally and buying locally, aiming to balance the advantages of centralization with the flexibility of decentralization. This transformation will require a strong focus on supplier relationship management to develop these reimagined supply bases and ensure that new suppliers meet the company’s standards when it comes to service levels, cost improvement initiatives, environmental key performance indicators (KPIs), and quality control.

For a real-world example, let’s consider Toyota. Famous for its “just in time” (JIT) production system, Toyota relies on long-term, strong relationships with its suppliers. By developing local suppliers and investing in their capabilities and capacities for years, Toyota has built trust and loyalty among its suppliers while achieving substantial stability in its supply chain. Local suppliers are more responsive and can deliver products faster than those located farther away. This approach has increased efficiency in production processes, enabling lower shipping and warehouse storage expenses. Thanks to this deeply integrated system with suppliers, Toyota has shown resilience against supply volatilities and maintained its leadership position in the global automotive marketplace. By incorporating local suppliers into its plans and managing inventory just in time, Toyota has gained a financial inventory benefit and cost advantage over its competitors. Furthermore, partnering with local producers is good for the environment, because it reduces global shipping and the company’s carbon footprint. “Glocalization” combines the global sourcing with the proximity of local availability of critical supplies. Think global, act local!

A more collaborative approach

This is why in more recent years much more attention has been paid to the development of “mutual” supplier-buyer relationships, where the benefits of doing business together arise from sharing and exchanging ideas. Effective and regular communication is the cornerstone of a strong supplier-buyer relationship; it aids in understanding each other's capabilities and expectations, and it fosters a sense of partnership. This is in complete contrast to short-sighted and adversarial relationships, where the focus is only on performing a financial transaction.

In the collaborative approach, the buyer organization seeks to develop a long-term relationship with the supplier. Establishing strong, enduring, and mutually beneficial relationships with a strategic supplier is a critical step in improving performance and ensuring consistent quality across the supply network. This is particularly important when adopting a glocalization strategy to build reliable supply chains that in turn benefit the customer experience.

The strategic view is that the buyer organization and the supplier should share a common interest, and both should seek ways of adding value in the supply chain that build a satisfactory outcome together. Both parties must invest in trusting and supporting the relationship with the intention of identifying and implementing improvements and innovations. Embedded in this approach is the commitment that any benefits that are achieved will be shared, a process not possible with a simple transaction. The organizations concerned will seek to come together and jointly set targets for overlapping interests.

This shift requires the role of sourcing to move away from a transactional one focused on materials and services management and toward a more strategic role, aligned to long-term business requirements. To be successful, supplier relationship management must play a pivotal role.

More Stories

Navigating supply chain dynamics

Navigating supply chain dynamics

In an era of rapid geopolitical change, supply chains have evolved from operational necessities to strategic assets. Trade tensions, regional conflicts, and localization-focused economic policies are reshaping global supply chain strategies, with significant implications for the United States and other regions. This shift demands a holistic approach that balances cost efficiency with resilience.

This report integrates insights from various regions to provide a US-centric perspective on the evolving supply chain landscape while examining the interplay between American strategies and global trends.

Keep ReadingShow less
A photo of the inside of a retail store. In the foreground is a sign that says "Pick up online orders here." In the background is two women at a cash register in a checkout lane.

Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.

By Wallpaper via Adobe Stock art

Build the store of the future with “buy online, pick up in store” and microfulfillment

Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.

BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less
digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could have been $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less