2025 Logistics Outlook: Cautious optimism tempered by tough realities
Logistics providers closed out 2024 dealing with flat business volumes, rising costs, increasing competition, excess truck capacity, and shippers demanding more value for their logistics dollar. Will 2025 provide a much-needed spark?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The year 2024 was by all accounts one of struggle and perseverance for supply chain practitioners. No one was immune, from shippers and their third-party service providers, to the truckers providing freight capacity, brokers managing transportation, and technology providers seeking to deliver the next big tech innovation.
At this time last year, many in the industry thought the back half of 2024 would provide at least a ray of hope for a rebound. However, 2024 came to a close with many of the same pressures and challenges that marked its beginning.
Nevertheless, in a series of interviews with shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), brokers, truck lines, industry associations, and analysts, there was a sense of cautious optimism about this upcoming year. That optimism is, however, tempered by a tough market as well as macroeconomic and political realities. Challenges remain—among them persistent excess trucking capacity, particularly on the truckload side; businesses delaying decisions on investment and expansion; an industrial economy that’s stuck in neutral; shifting supply chain nodes and flows; and shippers focused intensely on cost and looking to winnow down their stable of service providers.
Surviving a flat freight market
Jeff Jackson, president of the 3PL Penske Logistics, has seen many boom-and-bust cycles in his 30-plus years in the supply chain business. But he’s never seen a market like today’s. “Some call it a freight recession,” he says, “but [it’s] not really. Freight [volumes] have not retreated. It’s a capacity issue. There are still too many trucks out there chasing freight.”
He points out as well that persistent excess capacity has kept pricing depressed to the point that costs still exceed rates in the spot and contract markets. “That can only last for so long,” he says. “I’m not sure how much more [truckers] can take.”
One segment that remains solid, Jackson says, is the dedicated market, where a shipper contracts with a 3PL for a full-service dedicated trucking solution, including trucks, drivers, technology, and management and operating personnel.
Dedicated solutions, along with private fleets, are an attempt by shippers “to get more control over their supply chain” at a predicable cost and with consistently reliable service and capacity, Jackson notes. He is seeing a migration to dedicated, versus for-hire, that he believes will accelerate as a result of “nuclear verdicts” in trucking accident liability cases and the insurance crisis it has fueled.
“These nuclear verdicts are unsustainable,” he says. “You can’t listen to a big trucking company’s quarterly earnings call without hearing a reference to insurance premiums or claims being an issue. It’s a pretty steady conversation.”
Gary Petty, chief executive officer of the National Private Truck Council (NPTC), has a similar viewpoint on the rampant escalation of truck liability claims and awards. “There is no magic bullet to prevent getting sued at a nuclear-verdict level or beyond because the public views a truck accident as a driver-at-fault incident,” he says. The reality, according to Petty, is often the opposite. “The four-wheeled vehicles on the road are the ones causing the majority of accidents,” he says.
One area the NPTC and its members have focused on to protect themselves has been truck safety technology, particularly in-cab two-way cameras. “Those have been transformative; we have almost 80% penetration on the private fleet side,” Petty says. The cameras provide evidence of both fault and innocence in an accident, he says. Even more importantly, they provide a critical training and education tool to help drivers eliminate bad habits, improve skills, and increase safety.
Like dedicated services, private fleets have seen significant growth, and Petty expects it to continue. Private fleets today are a $300 billion business. (By definition, a private fleet is a trucking operation owned by a company that primarily focuses on manufacturing or distributing its own products, not on the trucking service itself.)
According to NPTC’s most recent annual market survey, the percentage of outbound shipments that moved with private fleets hit 75% in 2023, the highest level in the survey’s history. Overall, private fleets manage about 40% of the freight moving in the U.S. Some 942,000 companies now operate private fleets (which account for 47% of all truck fleets). Growth, as measured by the number of private fleet shipments, has averaged a little over 8% annually for the past five years.
Tough customers
As for the less-than-truckload (LTL) segment, the rise in nearshoring and reshoring is providing a welcome bump. “I definitely think we will continue to see growth [along the U.S.–Mexico border] in 2025,” says Chris Kelley, senior vice president of operations for trucker Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL). “During COVID, shippers found out that having products on the water for weeks or months at a time puts their business at risk. So shortening the supply chain became an imperative.”
Kelley additionally expects to see shippers become increasingly demanding—particularly about timely, accurate information and precision service—in 2025. “The rigors of delivery to retailers have become far more stringent,” he notes. “They want freight delivered within specific windows and times. Specific purchase orders delivered on a specific day. Certain freight arriving in certain trailers.”
For these customers, delivering early is just as bad as delivering late, sometimes worse, he says. And delivering late is just not an option. “They can’t afford to have their product languishing somewhere, missing a sales window. It has to be at the warehouse or on the shelf on time,” he notes.
Where’s the warehouse?
Over on the warehousing side, Melinda McLaughlin, global head of research at Prologis, one of the world’s largest operators of commercial warehousing space, believes the base case for recovery hinges on the prospect of an economic soft landing.
“Any volatility that interrupts what the Fed [Federal Reserve Board] is trying to engineer would change that,” she notes. “But given a soft landing, we see a gradual recovery in 2025.”
McLaughlin believes that a reduction in volatility and uncertainty could help “unlock” investment dollars in the warehousing market. She says that the uncertainty and volatility seen in 2023 and 2024 caused a “slowdown” in decision-making for things like expansion plans and fleet and facility investments. Volatility from geopolitics, natural disasters, and labor disruptions “points to a more disruptive future for supply chains,” she says.
Given market conditions, Prologis customers remain tightly focused on cost, especially as energy, wages, and construction costs continue to rise. Companies are also increasingly pressured to incorporate sustainability measures.
Consumers’ habits will play a large, additional role on distribution operations, as companies will need to adjust to the multiple ways they choose to shop and receive goods, McLaughlin adds. “We will have productivity enhancements, but at the same time, service levels really need to rise because that has defined the industry long term,” she says.
As a result, McLaughlin sees a trend toward staging goods—and the warehouses that handle storage and fulfillment—closer to end-consumers. This trend has also increased the importance of last-mile logistics. “It is about bringing scale as close to the end-consumer as possible,” she notes. “There are tremendous benefits and cost savings, as well as carbon emissions savings. You have fewer miles traveled.”
Overall, McLaughlin is hopeful the industry will see “clearer skies” in 2025. “Some companies are still conservative and remain pretty defensive in how they are running their supply chains,” she says. “They are waiting for more clarity and hope to see that in 2025.”
Key focus areas: cost, tech, and labor
Managing costs is also top of mind for 3PL customers. Steve Sensing, president of supply chain and dedicated transportation solutions for Ryder, says his customers are homed in on continuous improvement and are looking to Ryder to help them drive out costs.
“Their volumes are down, and they have challenges in key markets,” he says. “So it’s really about helping them manage costs in a down market. And they are equally as eager to make sure we are prepared to support them when the volume returns.”
Kenneth Clark Co., a 3PL that specializes in heavyweight, oversized, and project cargo logistics, is hearing similar demands from its customers, which are mainly makers of heavy machinery for the construction industry. President Ken Clark, whose grandfather founded the family-owned company in 1960, says his customers are facing an inventory glut at dealers.
As a result, he’s detected a shift in how shippers are planning for and managing their freight needs. “Whether it is using sophisticated technology or just good tactical execution to [boost] efficiency, shippers want to drive down costs. They are looking for how I as a broker or 3PL can make it as cost-effective as possible and still manage my freight with good service,” he notes.
Likewise, Sensing is also seeing an increasing demand from customers to be adept at the latest technology. “There is always going to be new technology, so we have to make sure we innovate and stay on top of it. Automation is becoming a bigger part of what we do, especially in the omnichannel area,” Sensing notes.
Part of this focus on technology is driven by the tight labor market. “Customers are concerned about getting people,” he says. “So they look to us for both technology and automation solutions as well as innovative hiring and retention programs.”
An eye on fraud
Another issue demanding attention in the brokerage space, says Clark, is fraud, such as double-brokering, as well as cargo theft and other nefarious practices. “We have to prevent unlicensed brokers, working from places not friendly to the U.S., from operating in the U.S.” he stresses. “We have been fighting this for years. It’s a huge problem: brokerages in Eastern Europe, Asia, and South America directing the movement of goods in the U.S. Some are commodities but others are sensitive goods we probably don’t want our adversaries to know about.”
Clark, along with Chris Burroughs, the president and CEO of the Transportation Intermediaries Association, is working with association members, government agencies, and other parties to shore up the licensing process, establish tougher requirements, and bring more transparency to who is directing freight. “It’s an existential threat to the industry, and shippers are looking to the brokerage community to come together and solve the problem,” says Burroughs.
Make it simple
Outside of solving the fraud issue, deploying more and better technology, and lowering logistics costs, shippers are looking to partner with logistics providers that are agile and efficient, offer consistent service, and can quickly solve problems, notes Dylan Rexing, president of 3PL PFL Logistics. They also want to deal with fewer suppliers. Rexing cites one shipper who last year went from a stable of 500 carriers and multiple brokers down to 250. “And they are planning to reduce that even further,” he says.
“From the customer’s perspective, they are always looking to us for ways we can make their lives easier, whether it’s integrating new tools, optimizing their freight, onboarding carriers, [providing] real-time visibility, or simply doing the blocking and tackling of the business flawlessly,” he says.
“Trucking is not all that sexy, in my opinion, but it is perhaps the most critical piece of the supply chain, and we want our customers to have confidence their goods are moving safely and efficiently, and are showing up when and where they expect them,” he concludes.
Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the December 2024 issue of DC Velocity.
Retailers should take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations not only to satisfy the growing demand for “buy online pickup in store” but also to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce.
Retailers are increasingly looking to cut costs, become more efficient, and meet ever-changing consumer demands. But how can they do so? The answer is updating their fulfillment strategy to keep pace with evolving customer expectations. As e-commerce continues to dominate the retail space and same-day delivery has become the norm, retailers must look to strengthen their “buy online pick up in store” (BOPIS) and microfulfillment strategies to stay ahead.
BOPIS allows customers to order online and pick up items at the retailers' brick-and-mortar location, and microfulfillment involves housing a retailer’s products closer to the consumer to improve delivery times. While these strategies each serve different purposes, both are centered around getting the product closer to the consumer to ensure faster fulfillment. By combining the two, retailers will be primed to meet customers’ needs—now and in the future.
The store of the future: meeting customers where they are
While e-commerce has become the top way for many consumers to shop today, building the store of the future does not mean focusing solely on an online fulfillment strategy and abandoning physical stores entirely. Instead, retailers can take advantage of their brick-and-mortar locations, often already situated in “hot spot” areas, to support microfulfillment efforts for e-commerce. These locations can also cater to the growing demand for BOPIS options, with 61% of consumers choosing to shop with a retailer that offers BOPIS over one that does not, according to recent Körber Supply Chain Software research.
When developing a fulfillment strategy, retailers should look to be able to satisfy customer needs at any moment in time. With the surge in same- or next-day shipping, consumers are no longer as interested in walking around a store to locate products or waiting many days for their items to arrive. Whether it’s on their doorstep or at the storefront, customers want their products as quickly as possible. For example, Körber Supply Chain Software found 29% of BOPIS shoppers would like their products to be ready almost immediately or within 30 minutes after placing an order.
Shoppers know which retailers can satisfy their need for quick fulfillment and will likely gravitate towards those companies for their shopping needs. For example, I recently placed a BOPIS order with a retailer, and when I arrived later that afternoon, my order still had not been picked yet. The retailer let me know that though I was currently there, based on their picking process, there were still multiple orders ahead of mine. While we both saw the product on the shelf, they were unable to fulfill my order given the inefficient process, prompting me to question whether I would continue to be loyal to that retailer.
To be successful, the store of the future must leverage technology to make the physical store a powerhouse for BOPIS and microfulfillment. By leveraging tools that provide insights on inventory location and consumer demand, companies can make informed decisions on the best approach for seamless fulfillment. So, how can companies get started with future-proofing their stores
How to develop a winning hybrid-fulfillment strategy
While meeting consumer demand is top of mind for retailers, operational efficiency and cost reduction are also priorities. It is not enough to just deploy BOPIS and microfulfillment; companies must focus on finetuning these strategies to maximize success. Some ways to do so include:
1. Utilize the “only handle it once” (OHIO) method: In a warehouse environment, companies keep a close eye on how much it costs to touch a product before they sell it. Typically, it is most cost-effective and efficient for companies to only handle it once. A similar consideration should be used for fulfilling orders through BOPIS or microfulfillment. For a BOPIS order, this might mean the product goes directly from the backroom of a store to a customer instead of being stocked on the shelf. For microfulfillment, this might mean going from a microfulfillment site directly to the consumers’ door.
2. Deploy solutions for inventory visibility, management, and communication: To successfully fulfill both online and in-person orders, retailers must have full visibility into the inventory within their warehouses and store locations and across the supply chain. From a BOPIS perspective, stores may be competing with in-person shoppers for the same items on the shelf. Therefore, it is key for retailers to fully develop their backroom inventory strategy, which may mean keeping some inventory off the shelves. While it is important for shoppers in store to have access to the full breadth and depth of assortment, it is also important that shoppers who buy online can get their order fulfilled.
Some retailers have already started operating like the store of the future. Reformation, a sustainable clothing store, has deployed an innovative retail concept at their Boston location where they only showcaseone of each garment. If a customer wants to try on an item, they use a tablet to request their size, and a sales associate retrieves the item from the store’s large backroom and brings it directly to the customer’s dressing room. BOPIS could be added to this arrangement, so that customers shopping in the store will have their needs met and customers shopping from home can ensure they will not receive a late order cancellation or delayed fulfillment.
Furthermore, having full visibility into inventory at physical stores can be leveraged on the microfulfillment side as well. Given that brick-and-mortar stores are strategically placed in areas where there is high consumer demand, their backrooms can also function as fulfillment centers for online orders, ensuring that the product gets into the customer’s hands as quickly as possible.
3. Continually analyze fulfillment strategy and fine-tune operations: Consumer demand is always evolving, making it difficult to predict what will be the next shift in expectations. Given this, it is critical for retailers to continually collect and analyze data, such as stock keeping unit (SKU) velocity, to ensure that they have an effective strategy.
With the demand for faster fulfillment, retailers will need to utilize this data to fine-tune their operations and ensure they are able to access the necessary products. To do so, retailers must examine backroom operations to make sure stocking items can readily be picked and staged for pickup. This approach also makes it possible, and easier, for retailers to ship direct to the consumer if they want to provide that option.
Looking ahead: hybrid fulfillment strategies in 2025 and beyond
As we head into 2025, companies are going to increasingly focus on how they serve their customers and ways to stand out among their competitors. If they have not done so already, many major retailers will utilize both BOPIS and microfulfillment to effectively and efficiently meet customers where they are. Looking ahead, customers will continue to demand faster fulfillment and more convenient ways to shop, making it critical for companies to fine-tune their BOPIS and microfulfillment strategies to avoid falling behind. By utilizing the above tips, decision-makers will have the insights they need to properly stock their stores and microfulfillment centers and meet customer needs.
Global forklift sales have slumped in 2024, falling short of initial forecasts as a result of the struggling economy in Europe and the slow release of project funding in the U.S., a report from market analyst firm Interact Analysis says.
In response, the London-based firm has reduced its shipment forecast for the year to rise just 0.3%, although it still predicts consistent growth of around 4-5% out to 2034.
The “bleak” figures come as the European economy has stagnated during the second half of 2024, with two of the leading industry sectors for forklifts - automotive and logistics – struggling. In addition, order backlogs from the pandemic have now been absorbed, so order volumes for the global forklift market will be slightly lower than shipment volumes over the next few years, Interact Analysis said.
On a more positive note, 3 million forklifts are forecast to be shipped per year by 2031 as enterprises are forced to reduce their dependence on manual labor. Interact Analysis has observed that major forklift OEMs are continuing with their long-term expansion plans, while other manufacturers that are affected by demand fluctuations are much more cautious with spending on automation projects.
At the same time, the forklift market is seeing a fundamental shift in power sources, with demand for Li-ion battery-powered forklifts showing a growth rate of over 10% while internal combustion engine (ICE) demand shrank by 1% and lead-acid battery-powered forklift fell 7%.
And according to Interact Analysis, those trends will continue, with the report predicting that ICE annual market demand will shrink over 20% from 670,000 units in 2024 to a projected 500,000 units by 2034. And by 2034, Interact Analysis predicts 81% of fully electric forklifts will be powered by li-ion batteries.
The reasons driving that shift include a move in Europe to cleaner alternatives to comply with environmental policies, and a swing in the primary customer base for forklifts from manufacturing to logistics and warehousing, due to the rise of e-commerce. Electric forklift demand is also growing in emerging markets, but for different reasons—labor costs are creating a growing need for automation in factories, especially in China, India, and Eastern Europe. And since lithium-ion battery production is primarily based in Asia, the average cost of equipping forklifts with li-ion batteries is much lower than the rest of the world.
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers’ share of large real estate leases across the U.S. rose significantly through the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same time last year, as more retailers and wholesalers have been outsourcing their warehouse and distribution operations to 3PLs, according to a report from real estate firm CBRE.
Specifically, 3PLs’ share of bulk industrial leasing activity—covering leases of 100,000 square feet or more—rose to 34.1% through Q3 of this year from 30.6% through Q3 last year. By raw numbers, 3PLs have accounted for 498 bulk leases so far this year, up by 9% from the 457 at this time last year.
By category, 3PLs’ share of 34.1% ranked above other occupier types such as: general retail and wholesale (26.6), food and beverage (9.0), automobiles, tires, and parts (7.9), manufacturing (6.2), building materials and construction (5.6), e-commerce only (5.6), medical (2.7), and undisclosed (2.3).
On a quarterly basis, bulk leasing by 3PLs has steadily increased this year, reversing the steadily decreasing trend of 2023. CBRE pointed to three main reasons for that resurgence:
Import Flexibility. Labor disruptions, extreme weather patterns, and geopolitical uncertainty have led many companies to diversify their import locations. Using 3PLs allows for more inventory flexibility, a key component to retailer success in times of uncertainty.
Capital Allocation/Preservation. Warehousing and distribution of goods is expensive, draining capital resources for transportation costs, rent, or labor. But outsourcing to 3PLs provides companies with more flexibility to increase or decrease their inventories without any risk of signing their own lease commitments. And using a 3PL also allows companies to switch supply chain costs from capital to operational expenses.
Focus on Core Competency. Outsourcing their logistics operations to 3PLs allows companies to focus on core business competencies that drive revenue, such as product development, sales, and customer service.
Looking into the future, these same trends will continue to drive 3PL warehouse demand, CBRE said. Economic, geopolitical and supply chain uncertainty will remain prevalent in the coming quarters but will not diminish the need to effectively manage inventory levels.